a) At what frequency are couple sessions?
b) How long are they?
c) Are there special things to do between sessions?
d) How long does the whole coaching process last?
e) How does the coaching end?
a) 2 or 3 weeks between sessions.
b) Sessions are 1 1/2 hours long.
c) Homework: 1. Individual type: a personal reflection to do and possibly put into writing about something of oneself which we spot as needing more attention. 2. Couple type: after some Imago Dialogue has been done in sessions, an exercise modeled on the session experience can be tried at home, once both partners feel ready; if the exercise “fails”, there is nevertheless much to learn, and we discuss the learnings at the following session.
d) At least 6-8 sessions are needed for a robust result.
e) The couple first informs us of their wish to finish. At the following session, we coach a balance-sheet procedure to review and evaluate between the partners what each one feels has been – and also not been – achieved; after this, we tell the couple how we imagine their next steps of growth.
Q2. What circumstances often bring a couple to get coaching ?
A2. There can be many. Here are a few:
1) The arrival of a baby and the efforts of child-raising: the fatigue and the routines sometime bring out “negative” personality traits of each partner that had shown up a lot before. These traits may bring a partner to start to doubt whether they chose “the right person”. Also, the typical decrease of interest for sex by the woman, as she tends to the baby’s needs, is quite difficult for most men who often react by being more distant and seeking fulfilment outside the family, for example by working too much.
2) The decrease of the erotic aspect of their relationship, compared to when they were falling in love. If the couple has gotten into too many non-erotic habits and routines in their daily functioning, and tends to be only a parental team and no longer lovers and confidants, each will be (differently) frustrated. Their two frustrations are hard to talk about without making things worse. Frequent quarrels may result, as each tries to assert oneself on other issues and get the other to recognize that he/she is “right” – which doesn’t work. Sometimes, on the contrary, there is too much avoidance of confrontation, which brings stagnation of their communication, with resulting boredom and distancing, so that the question “Why are we together?” looms.
3) More and more intense arguments. The differences between the 2 personalities, which were attractive at the beginning, seem to now cause big conflicts for numerous issues. The partners cannot understand why this keeps happening, cannot discuss the issues calmly and come to a real resolution or a new, common way of considering an issue. Must they just “sweep under the carpet” the hurt feelings that their arguments have brought?
4) For older couples, when all their children have left home, an atmosphere of emptiness may come, with anguishing questions such as: “Can our sexuality or sensuality – rendered dormant as parents – be revived?”, “What do we still have to say to each other?”, “Do we have enough common interests?”, or the most disturbing of all: “Shouldn’t we just separate, since there is nothing lively or attractive left between us?”
Q3. Why is starting a couple coaching difficult for a couple?
A3. Usually the woman in a (heterosexual) couple has the role of taking care of relationship quality. The male partner is typically satisfied with an amount and type of communication that is frustrating for the female partner. Therefore, disappointed by the results of her own efforts, she will usually be the one who pushes to get outside professional help – and the male partner often resists. It can felt by him as a personal failure, a devaluation; there may be a deep, un-verbalized shame which brings him to avoid exposing his “failure” to anyone imagined as a judge. (In fact, we do not judge the content of what the partners tell us, or try to fit someone into a diagnosis; our emphasis is on how they feel toward each other and to help get better communication going between them about all those feelings.)
The female partner also has some fears and is not eager to show certain aspects of herself where she feels she has acted badly, but her fears tend less to prevent getting help at all. In any case, we open up such topics and get both partners to express “negative” feelings or thoughts regarding the sessions. Sometimes, a very reluctant partner can first be seen once alone, which will enable his or her skeptical / pessimistic / suspicious / anxious tendencies to be moderated; clear information on reality can decrease that partner’s negative fantasizing.
Q4. Do you work on behavior change or on the childhood problems or trauma that may have influenced a partner’s way of being in a couple later on?
A4. We work on both. In the early, first phase, we deal with the communication behavior which has made it quasi impossible to speak to each other well about any somewhat thorny issue. We intervene to change this starting in the 1st or 2nd session, by setting up an “Imago Dialogue” between them; this structured conversation is the central tool of our “toolbox”. Each partner is brought to speak of oneself in a way that is designed for several purposes: 1) to maximize the empathy that the listener can gain for the speaker – instead of the listener closing down and lashing out because of feeling attacked – and 2) to give the speaker a chance to become fully conscious of what is going on inside him/herself linked with the triggering issue. During their Imago Dialogue, we coach both speaker and listener to behave differently than usual, both verbally and non-verbally, for the 30-60 minutes that this Dialogue lasts. However, this short experience can produce a deep feeling of peacefulness which can last beyond each Imago Dialogue. We give concrete instructions for extending this behavior change on their own between sessions, once they are ready, through structured homework exercises which resemble what was experienced in the sessions.
A later, second phase consists in a set of moments when, during an Imago Dialogue in a session, the very safe atmosphere allows certain feelings or charged memories of difficult situations in his/her past (the recent past, as in a previous couple relationship; or the more distant past, as in adolescence or childhood), which under normal conditions are hardly accessible, to come spontaneously to the surface, and so working on those feelings or situations can then be very fruitfully done. During these moments, we also help the listening partner respect the Imago Dialogue ground rules which ensure supportive responses.
Results: The listening partner may gain in understanding and empathy for the speaking one. There is a gift of quality of presence that the speaker receives during these key moments of work on his/her past. Having lived these moments may help both partners grasp what is actually going on behind the scenes when their clashes, quarrels, distancings, withdrawals, etc. happen. Such reactions do not stop, but sometimes will offer an opportunity for practicing the new skills learned. Example: when an emotional escalation begins in a conversation, instead of automatically letting the ping-pong game of escalation take over, they can remember the knowledge gained from the work on the past and its connections to the present, and/or use the behavior skills learned in the work on communication behavior change in order to stop the escalation and even become aware of other meanings that the situation contains; in this way, growth can happen instead of just re-wounding of both partners.